Hello,
FlexiCapture 11.0.2.1427, Distributed Installation.
I'm managing a project that has a Repeating Group section where 12 of the 13 Sub-Groups are optional.
The problem is that elements of say, Instance 2, are being capture in Instance 1 of the Repeating Group, resulting in some data that appears in between not being captured.
I cannot reliably use search constraints that are too tight due to the fairly large variation in the size of a single instance of the Repeating Group, but I can say that no two Sub-Groups of the Repeating Group are more that a specific distance apart.
Is there a piece of code that will allow me to apply this kind of restriction to the Advanced Pre-Search Relations of the Repeating Group, or if necessary, any of its' Sub-Groups or Sub-Elements?
Regards
Sam
コメント
6件のコメント
Hello,
Could you please send us the screenshots illustrating how your subgroups are organized? And how do you want to extract the data?
Hello,
Apologies for taking so long to reply, I've been working on other projects for the past couple of weeks
Here is a screenshot of the Repeating Group and its' Sub Elements; I am extracting the data as xml.
Thanks
Sam
Hello,
I do not see the screenshot.
Hello,
Sorry about that, I've attached a jpeg to my previous post, you should be able to download it.
Thanks
Sam
Hello,
Could you please describe the encountered problems with matching in more details or send us the screenshots showing them? Having the structure screenshot only, without any matching's results, is not enough to understand what causes the problem.
Please make sure that there are key elements in every instance of repeating group that allow to delimit the area of instance. Also it could be practical to use some elements with Optional(1,0); hypothesis quality, as it prevents matching from interrupting where the group has too many elements with non-ideal matching quality.
Hi Ekaterina,
Thank you for your advice on this, it's been a great help.
I've managed to resolve this issue by using a White Gap element to determine the end of the Repeating Group. From there on it was straight forward to get each instance of the Repeating Group to recognize correctly.
Thanks again
Sam
サインインしてコメントを残してください。